Faulkner and Failure

27 05 2012

William_Faulkner_300During a lovely coffee with a friend, we discussed the process/craft of writing and the reality that no idea is so perfect as when it’s in your head. It reminded me of William Faulkner (The Sound and The Fury, As I Lay Dying) and his interview in The Paris Review. Here’s what he says:

“In my opinion if I could write all my work again, I am convinced that I would do it better, which is the healthiest condition for an artist. That’s why he keeps on working, trying again; he believes each time that this time he will do it, bring it off. Of course he won’t, which is why this condition is healthy. Once he did it, once he matched the work to the image, the dream, nothing would remain but to cut his throat, jump off the other side of that pinnacle of perfection into suicide…”

Well… Here’s to imperfections, and the hope that we’ll always try to do better…





How I evolved as a Reader

25 09 2011

phonebookMy connection to books has changed greatly over the years. When I first started reading seriously (by that I mean reading literature) I refused to mark a book. I would have rather cut my own arm with a plastic picnic knife than dog ear a page, or underline a passage in a book. The edition didn’t matter. A small pocket paperback was just as sacred as a first-edition hard cover. No matter the format, they all had to look good on the shelf.

Gradually things began to change. It started with a dot. I would take a pencil and put a small, barely visible, point at the start of a poignant passage, then another at the end. To mark the page, I would tear up small pieces of paper, newsprint, post-it notes, whatever was nearby, and use that to save the place. My rational was that I could always erase the pencil mark, and the paper could always be removed.

Then, as time went on and I read more, I had a kind of epiphany. It may seem obvious to many, but to me it shook me harder than my older brother when I was seven. A book’s value isn’t in it’s form. Its value is in the ideas, stories and characters it contains. So long I harboured the illusion that my books were like trading cards, the more “mint” they were the higher their value.

Then I realized that a book’s value can only be reaped by harvesting its fruit (not to sound trite), and to do that you have to till the field. And that means, marking the pages, writing in the margins, underlining passages, and even taking the corner of a page and folding it inward.

Despite my inner struggle, I started “defacing” my books, even brand new ones. It was hard, but liberating. And the value was: it allowed me to engage with the book more. I reread passages. I noted my thoughts, even reflected on life. In a way, I was able to understand myself better by putting myself – my thoughts, ideas, and marks – in my books.

Now, my books have more marked pages than a New York phone-booth’s Yellow Pages in the 70’s.

The best part is,  now I quite often revisit books and look through my reading trail. This not only helps remind me of why I liked the book, but it also helps me to understand why I connected with the ideas, characters and story.

Basically, in order for me to evolve as a reader I had to get past the idea that a book, as an object, is sacred and should be left untouched. To really understand a book you have to interact with it. Just like the author, you have to take your pencil and put it to paper – then you’ll have a real conversation with the writer, the book, and yourself – and then you’ll find the true value of a book. 





Ernest Hemingway on The Art of Fiction

25 07 2011

Here are some interesting tidbits I pulled from Ernest Hemingway’s 1958 interview in The Paris Review, on the Art of Fiction.

Among other things, Hemingway discusses his process, when he likes to write, and the value of editing. It’s highly readable and informative, despite his apparent boredom for most of the questions: “I see I am getting away from the question, but the question was not very interesting.” And, “when you ask someone old, tired questions you are apt to receive old, tired answers.”

Two highlights from the interview:

One, his confirmation of a writer needing space to create: “You can write any time people will leave you alone and not interrupt you.”

Two, his answer to a question regarding an author’s training:

INTERVIEWER: What would you consider the best intellectual training for the would-be writer?

HEMINGWAY: Let’s say that he should go out and hang himself because he finds that writing well is impossibly difficult. Then he should be cut down without mercy and forced by his own self to write as well as he can for the rest of his life. At least he will have the story of the hanging to commence with.

Anyway, it’s a great interview. I urge anyone interested in a writer’s process or cantankerous literary icons to read the full interview.





Penguin releases The Classics iPhone app

29 06 2011

Only one choice? Really?

As publishers try to solve the discoverability problem  in the online retail realm (i.e. how do you make your titles stand out when there’s no online bookshelf, like at a real bookstore), Penguin takes its own approach and releases another Iphone app. Rather than focusing on one title, as they did with Jack Kerouac’s On the Road, “The Classics” app houses a complete annotated listing of all their “classics”.

The app will  recommend titles, based on your interests. Allow you to share recommendations with friends, via social media. As well, for those who only play Trivial Pursuit for the “Arts and Literature” questions, there are quizzes that to test your knowledge of Penguin’s Classics.

If you have an iPhone, or iPad, and you love Penguin it’s an easy grab. However, if you can’t stand apps that are so obviously marketing driven, then maybe wait until Penguin releases their next game app, Angry Penguin*.

Penguin releases Classics app | TeleRead: News and views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics.

*Note: no such game exists.





Book 9 – All the Names, by Jose Saramago

25 04 2010

015601

“Some of those who are born become entries in encyclopaedias, in history books, in biographies, in catalogues, in manuals, in collections of newspaper clippings, the others, roughly speaking, are like a cloud that passes without leaving behind it any trace of its passing, and if rain fell from that cloud it did not even wet the earth.”
                         – All the Names, by Jose Saramago

All right. Here it is. Book nine done. I’m so happy too. I was ready for a book I could connect with, really get in to, especially after my disappointment with the previous two books.

Why did I pick All the Names, by Jose Saramago? Well, I don’t really have a reason, other than I really like Jose Saramago. I have read The Gospel According to Jesus Christ and Blindness, I found both amazing.

All the Names is like a low-level mystery novel. The main character, Senhor Jose, comes across the birth certificate of an anonymous woman. He decides this event is not mere chance, so he decides to find her. After a series of leads, dead-ends, and close calls, Senhor Jose learns what he is really seeking.

While I thoroughly enjoyed All the Names, Saramago is a tough read. The text is dense; the paragraphs can go on for pages; and the dialogue is built in to the paragraphs. Despite all that, Saramago is very rewarding. There’s a soft humour and a penetrating humanity to his writing.

If you recall from my previous post about The Turn of The Screw, I was very put off by James’ dense, meandering writing style. Given that Saramago shares this similarity, you’d think I would have struggled with Saramago too. But I didn’t. And I think the key difference is that Saramago is engaging. He brings you in to the story, with Senhor Jose. While, with James you merely feel as though you’re watching things from a balcony, high up above; you can see the story but you’re not a part of it.

The other part I enjoyed about this story of a lonely clerk is its simplicity. In fact, it reads more like a short story than a novel. There are really only three characters, Senhor Jose, the Registrar, and the anonymous woman. Sure there are other minor characters that help move events, and provide insight about the major characters, but there is a single mindedness to the narrative. It made the story easy to follow, and easier to get caught up with.   

Obviously I am a fan of this one. I love Saramago. I think he is a great writer and should be cherished. If you are at all swayed, or inspired, by my gushing, I say check him out. Be prepared for the dense text and wandering sentences, but know that it will be worth it.

Next book: As I lay Dying, by William Faulkner





Book 7 – Naked Lunch, by William S. Burroughs

31 03 2010

Naked Lunch“He it is… He and no other who has reduced whole provinces of our fair land to a state bordering on the far side of idiocy… He it is who has filled great warehouses with row on row, tier on tier of helpless creatures who must have their every want attended… ‘The Drones’ he calls them with a cynical leer of pure educated evil…”
                       – Naked Lunch, by William S. Burroughs

As a reader I have two rules. One: always finish a book. And, two: always find one good thing to say about it.

Sometimes those rules are easier to tout than follow.

I have always tried to abide by these rules. To me not finishing a book is quitting. Even if I loath a book I will charge on. Oh, I may curse and spit while doing so but I will keep reading. 

Why put myself through this? Well, it can somewhat be explained by my possessing an unhealthy balance of pride, stubbornness and stupidity. But, also, I make a commitment to the writer. I’ll follow their story, on their terms. I believe just because I may not enjoy a novel doesn’t mean I shouldn’t finish reading it.

Before I get further into it, I should tell you: I like the beat writers. Kerouac is cool. On the Road rules – though, I’ll never understand why he left that woman in the cotton fields. I like Ginsberg. Plutonian Ode is a great collection of poems. I want to say I like Burroughs too, but prior to this I had never read anything by him.

With all that in mind, I purchased Naked Lunch years ago. It was on sale at a used bookstore. I was attracted by the yellow cover, sideways title, and the lure of it being a previously banned book (much in the same way naked_lunch_prospectusthat people are drawn to Tropic of Cancer, by Henry Miller).

For those who don’t know, the story line is roughly: a drug addict travels from New York to Tangiers, and then into a nightmarish, fantasy, world called Interzone.

After finishing the book in a little over a week, I can safely say I cursed those rules. I hated them so much; I had half an idea to shave them into the side of a dog, preferably a chocolate coloured Labrador retriever, then push it down the stairs.* 

But, I didn’t.

I charged on. I put the dog idea to the side, for later, and kept reading.

I am happy I read it, but I’m even happier to be done with it. There were moments I liked, and even a few pages I “dog eared”, to reread for later. Still, overall, it’s a tough read. The writing style is highly experimental: the narrative is non-linear; the tone and voice changes constantly; the main character takes on many different aliases; and the flipping between fantasy and reality is confusing.

Despite it being confusing and hard to follow I stuck to my first rule, just barely, and finished the book. As for the second rule, I will start by saying this: I love the serendipity of reading. Quite a few times in my life my outside world has matched up with what I’m reading.

In high school a friend gave me a book for my birthday. At the same time my youngerJohnSteinbeck_TheGrapesOfWrath brother and his band (www.rcoriginal.wordpress.com) were practicing a song they would play at their school’s talent show. While I was reading the book my brother came in to my room and started telling me about the song he was practicing, ‘Ghost of Tom Joad’. The events in the song were eerily similarly to what was happening in my book, The Grapes of Wrath. “Do you think the song is about the book?” we wondered.

It was.

Gotj

We were amazed at our discovery. What is the likelihood that our  lives would connect in such a way, at that moment? Not very likely, we decided.

It felt so eerie and odd, like we were we in the opening scene of Magnolia**, the movie. “It is in the humble opinion of this narrator that this is not just something that happens. This cannot be one of those things. This, please, cannot be that. This was not just a matter of chance.”

Since then, my books and life have matched up in other ways. Some may explain this as my own personal confirmation bias. Still, it doesn’t make the discoveries any less eerie, exciting, or rewarding.

Back to Naked Lunch. My one good thing to say about the book, and my potentially serendipitous discovery, is the text I quoted at the top of this blog. I am a huge fan of the Australian badrones-covernd, The Drones (see their video below). When I read this passage, I  wondered, “is this where they got their name?”

I then looked on the internet for the answer. After a brief investigation I have not found one. I can only assume that “this is not one of those things”; There has to be a connection. The Drones are an intelligent, literary band. Based on that – and until I can ask them personally – I will believe “this is that”.

And, that is my good thing to say about this book. I may not have enjoyed the book, but it did help me discover something about my favourite Australian band – even if it could be just a coincidence.

Next book: The Turn of The Screw, by Henry James.

*Please note: I don’t advocate animal cruelty, unless, of course, it helps illustrate a point.

**Yes, I know, the movie wasn’t out yet.’

Watch “The Minotaur’, from The Drone’s new album, Havilah. Best line from the song: “He spends all day looking at porn, or playing, fucking, Halo 2” Enjoy.





Book 6 – Three Men in a Boat, by Jerome K. Jerome

27 03 2010

Three men in a boat

“Everything has its drawbacks, as the man said when his mother-in-law died, and they came down upon him for the funeral expenses.” 
                 – Three Men in a Boat, by Jerome K. Jerome

 
I’m putting this post up now, even though I don’t really know what to say. I finished the book last week. Due to work, school and other obligations I haven’t had time to write anything about it. Seeing that this is a story about three guys (and a dog) going on a rowing excursion that goes horribly wrong, I thought I could recount a camping story of my own. I don’t really have many good things to say about the book so I thought this would be a good way of distracting myself.

I now realize this is the opposite of what I should be doing. I have to own how I feel about this book. I can’t go recounting poorly planned, organized and executed camping trips of my youth. Sure I could tell you about my first camping trip, when we got lost on the way to the camping site and my older brother had to come looking for us after nightfall. Or the time my friend’s old 1950, cherry and white, Chevy broke down in the bush and we had to get it towed out, again my older brother drove up to find us and help take us home. I could even tell you about the time in Australia when I camped in the bush, on my own, for over three weeks, where I met “the messiah” there (I’m not even joking) – and my brother didn’t have to come looking for me. But, like I said above, this would all be just a distraction.

This book made me feel nothing. I was constantly distracted while reading it. I’ld start reading at the top of the page, obviously. By the end of the first paragraph I would be thinking of something else. I tried blocking out my surrounding environment by channelling my focus on the text, but even then my mind would wander. I don’t know what it was. I was having the same problem with Gulliver’s Travel.

Three men in a boat

Maybe it’s the style of writing. They are both 19th century texts. They are both first person narratives, where it’s hard for the reader to feel a true connection to the narrator; he’s rigid and distant. Even if he and I went to counselling together, for years, I don’t think I would be able to find a way to break down the barrier between us.

Perhaps it was the long, meandering sentences. They sure got the most out of their commas and semi-colons back then. If they could break those sentences up, make their ideas clearer and more immediate, then, perhaps, I could connect with it.

Or, maybe it’s because the story relies so heavily on a previous understanding of English sensibilities and the English environment. Sure, he described things using “non-comparative” terms, but there were other times, and generally more often, when I was expected to already know about the specific cities, counties, or shires. At least that’s how it felt. I could be completely wrong and just looking for faults in the text.

Anyway, those are my thoughts on it. I’m happy to be done with the book, but sad that I didn’t like it more. A good friend of mine really liked it and recommended it highly. Like, Gulliver’s Travels I hope to read it again in the future and maybe gain a better appreciation from a second read. Oh well, till then I will move on to the next book (which I have almost completed, and am not that impressed with either). I’ll let you know how it goes, soon.

Next book: Naked Lunch, by William S. Burroughs. 

 





Book 5 – Cloudstreet, by Tim Winton

13 03 2010

cloudstreet

“‘God, you sound like a book…What did you ever get out of [books], anyway?’
‘…some idea of how other people lived their lives, Mum. A look at real people.’”
                                       – Cloudstreet, by Tim Winton

These past couple weeks I have been missing Australia like a child misses their foster parents. I lived in Oz for over three years. I moved back to Canada last summer. When I left I was happy to be done with the whole lot. Sure the weather was great and the landscape spectacular, but I had to leave. Australia was my adopted home, but I had been an expat too long. I was getting tired of being “the foreigner”. And, besides, my visa was going to expire, so I had to decide between applying for permanent residency or moving on. I knew  it was time for me to go home, be close to family, and remind myself why I love Canada so much.

I have been home seven months now. I have thoroughly enjoyed being back. I attended three weddings (was in the bridal party for two), moved to Montreal for 3 months (where I got a job as a dishwasher in Old Montreal), started up an online radio show with a buddy (you can listen to us here), and am taking an editing course through SFU. Plus, I got to be here, in Vancouver, for the Olympics. All in all my time back has been great.

Then I started reading Cloudstreet. I received it  as a Christmas gift last year. I tried reading it once before. I didn’t like the writing style so I put it down. Which is funny, because the previous year I had received Tim Winton’s “The Turning”, a collectionCloudstreet2 of his short stories, and I absolutely loved them. His writing was so vibrant, yet required very little details to create an impression. The first story, ‘Big World’, is one of my favourite short stories. It’s funny, insightful, and bleeds adolescent truth. 

This is why my initial distaste for Cloudstreet upset me. I wanted to like it, but, I guess, it wasn’t meant to be, at that time. I brought the book back to Canada with me, and let it sit on my bookshelf for the past six months. Now that I have finished it, I am happy to say that my opinion has changed. I do like it. And, while it doesn’t make my top ten list of favourite novels it is definitely one I will recommend to friends.

Cloudstreet, to me, is a cross between “East of Eden”, by John Steinbeck, and “The Sundowners”,  by Jon Cleary. (Interestingly, both novels were published in 1952.) Roughly, the story follows two families, The Pickles and The Lambs, as they cohabitate in the same house, called Cloudstreet. Over the span of decades they fight, laugh, and learn the value of family.

Winton explores many themes throughout the novel, like the battle between luck and God’s plan, the changing role and identity of men in post-war Australia,  the need for independence and family, and how we remember our childhood and the past.

Given the size of the families, and the intermingling, Winton had a large cast to balance. He could have easily been bogged down by featuring every character’s story arch; luckily he doesn’t. He follows a few characters more closely than others and uses them to illustrate everyone’s experiences.

cloudstreet3 I loved the book for it’s descriptive style. One of Winton’s strength’s is his word choice. He does not waste words on a page. Every line, sentence and word has a weight and provides balance. Remove one and the feeling is gone. I would reread whole sentences and remove adjectives to see how vital they were for that sentence. Just as a quick example, here is a passage from one of the more traumatic scenes in the novel. A child is hit by a train:

“…the engine smacks him with the sound of a watermelon falling of the back of a truck, and he’s gone. Everything is screaming. The train punishes itself to a halt.”

Now, take out, and change, the words: “smack”, “watermelon”, and “punishes itself”. Change them to, say, “the engine hits him with the sound of a doll falling of the back of a truck, and he’s gone. Everything is screaming. The train comes to a halt.”

Without the original words the passage has lost all of its power and resonance. “Smack” has the double effect of giving the impression of sound and the act of being hit. “Watermelon” adds weight and texture. And “punishes itself” humanizes the train – it adds another character to the scene, allowing the reader to relate to the events.

Not to hyperbolize, or overplay the affects the book had on me, but I loved it. My father once told me “ a great book will  affect you in ways you don’t expect. When the character(s) is having a good day, it makes you have a good day too. But if he is having a bad day, then, somehow, that makes you have a bad day.” And that’s exactly what Cloudstreet did. It was so easy to connect with these characters. They seemed so human, real, and, at times, lovable, I wished I could be there with them in the kitchen and “give the knife a spin”.

Cloudstreet has made me want to go back to Australia. Maybe not to live, but at least visit. It has reminded me of all the things I miss there: two-up, meat pies, League’s clubs, the Darby Raj, swimming, Roos, and the orange, hot sunsets over the hills.

The next book: “Three Men in a Boat”, by Jerome K. Jerome 





Book 1 – The Castle, by Franz Kafka

15 01 2010

The Castle-1

Two things are apparent when you visit Prague. One, the homeless are very patient and can endure great physical pain – it’s common to see a person kneeling upon the hard cobblestone street, head bowed, their elbows on the ground, and their hands cupped in the air. It is very difficult to pass them by without feeling pangs of sympathy for these poor people. Two, Kafka is much revered. Everything from bookstores and hotels to coffee shops are named after Franz Kafka. Souvenirs of him and his works are everywhere.

While there in the winter of 2003 I wondered if Kafka, the son of a middle-class business man, could have imagined his writings and name would become so entwined in the Czech Republic capital. I also wondered if he really did want his friend and literary executor, Max Brod, to burn all his writings after his death. He received very little acclaim during his lifetime. Was the request a result of frustration? Or because he knew Brod would not obey the demand,?

Whatever the reason, it probably is best that Brod didn’t follow his friend’s demand. Kafka has undeniably left his imprint on literature. His form and style have its own name, Kafkaesque – meaning, “marked by a senseless, disorienting, often menacing complexity”. The Kafka Prize is awarded each year to a book for its “humanistic, existential, and timeless character, its generally human validity and its ability to hand over a testimony about our times.” Philip Roth was the first to win this prize in 2001.

The Castle was Kafka’s last novel. He died in 1924, of tuberculosis, leaving the novel unfinished. Whether he intended to actually finish the novel is open to debate. Kafka wrote to Brod in 1922 saying he had decided to give up on the novel.  Prior to his death Kafka told Brod and their friends about the story’s ending. I will not recount the proposed ending here. Though, given the definite ending he had in mind and his desire to tell his friends about it, I believe that if he had the time he would have finished it. According to Thomas Mann, in the “Homage” to the 1954 ‘definitive edition’, “The Castle is not complete, but probably not more than one chapter is missing”.

As it stands we are left with the unfinished version. As it also stands, The Castle was my first novel for the 25 in 2010 book read. I had previously read The Trial, as well as many of Kafka’s short stories. I felt this to be a natural starting point, as Kafka is a writer I highly enjoy. I started on January 2nd. I figured if I read 20 pages a day, then I would be able to finish the 280 page novel in 14 days. The reality of it was this: on my busy days I read nothing. And on my free days I read more. Until finally, I read the last 80 pages today.

I did keep a journal as I read. I won’t be recounting the entries here, but I will give you my overall feelings from those entries. The thing I like about Kafka’s stories are the situations. I love reading about logical people in illogical settings. His characters seem placed in a waking dream. The circumstances and obstacles are so foggy that they are logically unfathomable.

K., the main character, comes to a village to work as a land-surveyor, after allegedly being summoned by The Castle. His position, and right to be in the village, is promptly denied by the castle. The novel follows K.’s attempts to make contact with Klamm, The Castle’s official, and rectify the situation. Throughout the story K. fights endless bureaucracy, tries to understand the arbitrary rules and regulations, and tries to cope with two assistants, whom are more of a hindrance than a help.

While I enjoyed the novel, and am glad I read it, I did find myself suffering through it towards the end. From the half way point onward the narrative turns slow and creeping, as if I was having to traverse through a sludgy bog. Much of the latter half is spent in long, tendriling conversations between characters. Paragraphs go on for pages. The plot advances very little and much of what is learned are character’s backgrounds and speculations on motives.

There are two reasons of for why this story shifts like this. One, the first half of the story had originally been written in first person. Kafka decided to change the perspective later, thus replacing all the “I’s” with “K.’s”. The second half he wrote from a purely third person perspective. Two, stylistically, Kafka could be using the format in the second half to further illustrate K.’s frustratingly slow, almost negligible, progress. Near the end of the story K. falls asleep for 12 hours out of sheer fatigue, after enduring the conversations and interactions of the previous 48 hours. By the time I had reached this point, I wanted to sleep too. I was desperate for some sort of resolution, some sign that things would soon be straightened.

Resolution does not come, for K. or myself. we are both destined to stumble through this seemingly illogical world. I’m happy to be finished it. I don’t think I could have willingly endured any more stagnation. I often wondered throughout the story, why K. decided to stay. As a land-surveyor you would think he could go anywhere else and get better treatment. I like to think I would have just left. But then how many of us stay in jobs, or situations, we hate? They eat us up inside, but we refrain from moving on.

Perhaps this is what makes Kafka’s stories so believable, despite their situational illogicalness. Kafka’s stories, like The Trial, At The Penal Colony, and Metamorphosis, have a poignancy. Sure the situations are unlikely, but given that we are viewing things through a rational person, much like ourselves, we can believe it. Things may be odd, but there is a larger point.

What’s the larger point to The Castle? I don’t want to go into the symbolism, theological and otherwise, motifs, and themes. But, this is the main point: if you are contracted to do some work for a place you’ve never been before, bring your paperwork. Things would have been so much easier had K. just had the right forms. That’s not The Castle’s fault, so why should everyone else suffer as a result?

Anyway, that’s it. Now on to the Next book: Something Happened, by Joseph Heller.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: